Fairfield CityCommunity profile
Skip to content

Horsley Park

Housing tenure

In Horsley Park, 74% of households were purchasing or fully owned their home, 16.3% were renting privately, and 0.0% were in social housing in 2021.

Horsley Park's Housing Tenure data provides insights into its socio-economic status as well as the role it plays in the housing market. For example, a high concentration of private renters may indicate a transient area attractive to young singles and couples, while a concentration of home owners indicates a more settled area with mature families and empty-nesters (Household Summary). Tenure can also reflect built form (Dwelling Type), with a significantly higher share of renters in high density housing and a substantially larger proportion of home-owners in separate houses, although this is not always the case.

In conjunction with other socio-economic status indicators in Horsley Park, Tenure data is useful for analysing housing markets, housing affordability and identifying public housing areas.

Further reading: How can Councils influence affordable housing.

Derived from the Census questions:

'Is this dwelling (owned outright, owned with a mortgage etc.)', and 'If this dwelling is being rented, who is it rented from?'

Households

Housing tenure
Horsley Park - Households (Enumerated)20212016Change
Tenure typeNumber%Mount Pritchard %Number%Mount Pritchard %2016 to 2021
map this data in atlas.idFully owned27249.726.527851.128.6-6
map this data in atlas.idMortgage13324.331.512222.432.9+11
Renting - Total
9317.032.58114.928.8+12
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Social housing00.010.000.010.40
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Private8916.322.08114.918.2+8
Renting - Not stated
40.70.400.00.1+4
Other tenure type
142.61.6142.60.90
Not stated
356.47.9499.08.9-14

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2016 and 2021. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions).

Housing tenure, 2021
Housing tenure, 2021 Other tenure type, Mount Pritchard: 1.6% Renting - Private, Mount Pritchard: 22.0% Renting - Social housing, Mount Pritchard: 10.0% Renting - Total, Mount Pritchard: 32.5% Mortgage, Mount Pritchard: 31.5% Fully owned, Mount Pritchard: 26.5% Other tenure type, Horsley Park: 2.6% Renting - Private, Horsley Park: 16.3% Renting - Social housing, Horsley Park: 0.0% Renting - Total, Horsley Park: 17.0% Mortgage, Horsley Park: 24.3% Fully owned, Horsley Park: 49.7%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2021 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).
Change in housing tenure, 2016 to 2021
Change in housing tenure, 2016 to 2021 Other tenure type, Horsley Park: 0 Renting - Private, Horsley Park: +8 Renting - Social housing, Horsley Park: 0 Renting - Total, Horsley Park: +12 Mortgage, Horsley Park: +11 Fully owned, Horsley Park: -6
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2016 and 2021 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).

Dominant groups

Analysis of the housing tenure of households of Horsley Park in 2021 compared to Mount Pritchard shows that there was a larger proportion of households who owned their dwelling; a smaller proportion purchasing their dwelling; and a smaller proportion who were renters.

Overall, 49.7% of households owned their dwelling; 24.3% were purchasing, and 17.0% were renting, compared with 26.5%, 31.5% and 32.5% respectively for Mount Pritchard.

Emerging groups

There were no major differences in Horsley Park between 2016 and 2021.

The total number of households in Horsley Park increased by 3 between 2016 and 2021.

v20.11.10-1.0.0