Fairfield CityCommunity profile
Skip to content

Fairfield City

Housing tenure

In Fairfield City, 56% of households were purchasing or fully owned their home, 28.3% were renting privately, and 7.7% were in social housing in 2021.

Fairfield City's Housing Tenure data provides insights into its socio-economic status as well as the role it plays in the housing market. For example, a high concentration of private renters may indicate a transient area attractive to young singles and couples, while a concentration of home owners indicates a more settled area with mature families and empty-nesters (Household Summary). Tenure can also reflect built form (Dwelling Type), with a significantly higher share of renters in high density housing and a substantially larger proportion of home-owners in separate houses, although this is not always the case.

In conjunction with other socio-economic status indicators in Fairfield City, Tenure data is useful for analysing housing markets, housing affordability and identifying public housing areas.

Further reading: How can Councils influence affordable housing.

Derived from the Census questions:

'Is this dwelling (owned outright, owned with a mortgage etc.)', and 'If this dwelling is being rented, who is it rented from?'

Households

Housing tenure
Fairfield City - Households (Enumerated)20212001Change
Tenure typeNumber%Wetherill Park %Number%Wetherill Park %2001 to 2021
map this data in atlas.idFully owned19,22130.041.023,40642.554.1-4,185
map this data in atlas.idMortgage16,50025.728.811,46520.824.5+5,035
Renting - Total
23,32536.425.416,34029.615.4+6,985
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Social housing4,9427.71.54,6958.51.4+247
map this data in atlas.idRenting - Private18,17428.323.911,28720.513.7+6,887
Renting - Not stated
2090.3--3580.60.3-149
Other tenure type
9731.51.68591.61.7+114
Not stated
4,1026.43.03,0535.54.3+1,049

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing 2001 and 2021. Compiled and presented by .id (informed decisions).

Housing tenure, 2021
Housing tenure, 2021 Other tenure type, Wetherill Park: 1.6% Renting - Private, Wetherill Park: 23.9% Renting - Social housing, Wetherill Park: 1.5% Renting - Total, Wetherill Park: 25.4% Mortgage, Wetherill Park: 28.8% Fully owned, Wetherill Park: 41.0% Other tenure type, Fairfield City: 1.5% Renting - Private, Fairfield City: 28.3% Renting - Social housing, Fairfield City: 7.7% Renting - Total, Fairfield City: 36.4% Mortgage, Fairfield City: 25.7% Fully owned, Fairfield City: 30.0%
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2021 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).
Change in housing tenure, 2001 to 2021
Change in housing tenure, 2001 to 2021 Other tenure type, Fairfield City: +114 Renting - Private, Fairfield City: +6,887 Renting - Social housing, Fairfield City: +247 Renting - Total, Fairfield City: +6,985 Mortgage, Fairfield City: +5,035 Fully owned, Fairfield City: -4,185
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Census of Population and Housing, 2001 and 2021 (Enumerated data)
Compiled and presented in profile.id by .id (informed decisions).

Dominant groups

Analysis of the housing tenure of households of Fairfield City in 2021 compared to Wetherill Park shows that there was a smaller proportion of households who owned their dwelling; a smaller proportion purchasing their dwelling; and a larger proportion who were renters.

Overall, 30.0% of households owned their dwelling; 25.7% were purchasing, and 36.4% were renting, compared with 41.0%, 28.8% and 25.4% respectively for Wetherill Park.

Emerging groups

The largest changes in housing tenure categories for the households in Fairfield City between 2001 and 2021 were:

  • Renting - Private (+6,887 households)
  • Mortgage (+5,035 households)
  • Fully owned (-4,185 households)
  • Renting - Social housing (+247 households)

The total number of households in Fairfield City increased by 8,998 between 2001 and 2021.

v20.11.10-1.0.0